Essay Questions - Texas Jurisdiction Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1000 words

Questions - Texas Jurisdiction - Essay Example trust likewise contains no clause authorizing the bank to take possession of the mortgaged property, the only remedy afforded the bank in the Deed of Trust is the nonjudicial foreclosure it bargained for. Lighthouse Church Of Cloverleaf v. Texas Bank, 889 S.W.2d 595 (Tex.App.—Houston [14th Dist] 1994). After the debt secured by a deed of trust has matured, by acceleration or otherwise, the mortgagee may, in accordance with  § 51.002 of the Property Code and the deed of trust, foreclose on real property by nonjudicial sale. This chapter discusses the foreclosure sale of real property in Texas—what it is, what its prerequisites are, and what its consequences may be. Repossession of real estate cannot be compared to repossession of personal property. Repossession of personal property is governed by Chapter 9 of the Texas Uniform Commercial Code. Tex. Bus. & Com. Code Ann.  §Ã‚ § 9.101 et seq. (Vernon 1991). Chapter 9 specifically creates the right to self-help repossession. Tex. Bus. & Com. Code Ann.  § 9.503 (Vernon 1991). Real estate is specifically excluded from the scope of that chapter. Tex. Bus. & Com. Code Ann.  § 9.104(10) (Vernon 1991). Thus, Chapter 9 does not give creditors a right to repossess real estate in the same way they repossess personal property. Lighthouse Church Of Cloverleaf v. Texas Bank, 889 S.W.2d 595 (Tex.App.—Houston [14th Dist] 1994). Questions concerning title to real estate, the validity of conveyances, warranties, and foreclosures are determined by the law of the situs. Pellow v. Cade, 990 S.W.2d 307 (Tex.App.—Texarkana 1999), rehg overruled, (Mar. 19, 1999). A person must bring suit for the recovery of real property under a real property lien or the foreclosure of a real property lien, including a voluntary mechanics or materialmans lien, no later than four years after the day the cause of action accrues. Tex. Civ. Prac. & Rem. Code Ann.  § 16.035(a). Voluntary mechanics and materialmans liens on real estate, securing a note

Professional Analysis of Job Description Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 500 words

Professional Analysis of Job Description - Essay Example A HR manager should have excellent control over communication skills. This not only involves speaking and listening, but also not verbal communication such as written and control over facial expressions. For a company that requires only the best, prior experience in this field is an absolute necessity. Until and unless the HR manager has seen and lived through enough years of handling different employees, a manager is not be ready to face challenges that a big company creates. The HR manager position at the manufacturing organization is very demanding even for an experienced manager. Apart from the skills required as mentioned in the above section, the HR manager would be required to develop the organization and management culture. Complete business units/teams will have to be created, coordinated and evaluated so that managers could meet their business objectives. The HR manager would also be required to improve the individual skills of the employees so that the organization as a whole can benefit from it. Another differentiating requirement for this HR manager position is the need to be involved in the commercial decisions taken by the organization. Not only would the manager need to understand business decisions, the manager would also need to facilitate the business and solve any business issues within the organizational teams. Truly such responsibilities cannot be undertaken by an inexperienced manager, in-fact an experienced manager would find under taking such duties, roles and responsibilities enormously challenging. (McNamara,

Commentary On Hawk Roosting and The Author Essay Example for Free

Commentary On Hawk Roosting and The Author Essay The poem Hawk Roosting demonstrates the predator and prey process through the extensive use of metaphors and personification. The hawk is portrayed as a ruthless predator who surveys its surrounding in search for its meal. At the same time, the hawk is personified as a ruler and creator who possess a great deal of wisdom [W1]and strength. This brings out the subject of the poem that the hawk is an idealistic [W2]and arrogant creature, suggesting that is Hughes is trying to challenges our perspective of being a human. As humans, many of us believe that we are the supreme beings in the entire world, that this world was created by God solely for us, that we are imbued with the ultimate task of looking after the world. This is ironic by the fact that the roosting hawk is looking down on us here, fully convinced that the world is his for the picking and yet ignorant of the fact that a higher authority exists. While the seat of our intellect is innately the hawks tearing of heads, we pride ourselves on our sophistry and manners'[W3]. Furthermore, the hawk also states that we live in the myth of progress, that history is cyclical, as seen in nothing has changed since I began[W4]. This leads to consider an unanswered question of life: Are we the only ones running the show?[W5] An in depth analysis reveals that the author chose to write the poem in a monologue 6 quatrains structure, each resembling a monologue[W6]. Stanza 1 shows that the hawk believes that he is natures most deadly and perfected creature. Stanza 2 shows that the hawk possesses the arrogance of a king. Stanza 3 emphasizes the complexity and uniqueness of the hawk. Stanza 4 shows the hawk doesnt have good manners. Stanza 5 suggests the hawk wields unquestionable authority over ones[W7] fate. Stanza 6 shows the hawk exercising power over his regime. In stanza 1, the hawk is napping. While weaker birds are always on their guard and are alert, the hawk sleeps without worrying about being threatened. Through the use of personification, the hawk is given human characteristics. As[W8] the hawk can speak in poem, [W9]we are given the opportunity to experience the hawks world through its eyes. In line 4, the hawk makes reference to his killing ability- perfect kills, prominently highlighting the arrogance of the hawk. In stanza 2, the hawks arrogance is even more stressed. The hawk perceives his surroundings as his submissive servant[W10]. The high trees were exclusively created for its convenience; the airs buoyancy provides greater lift; the sunrays [W11]shines light onto its meal[W12]. In stanza 3, the hawk portrays itself as an authority above god. This is seen in line 12, Now I hold Creation in my foot. Making the point that it has surpassed its creator and now assumes the responsibility of creation. In stanza 4, the hawk attempts to show off its authority. This is seen in I kill where I please because it is all mine. The hawk makes openly reveals its uncompromising and ruthless way of killing. tearing off heads. It shows that the hawk is free of social obligations and does not have to be polite in its mannerisms.

Health Benefits of Dark Chocolate

Health Benefits of Dark Chocolate Natalija Miller Get Your Daily Dose of Chocolate: The Darker, The Better! It has been reported that there are certain types of bacteria located within the human stomach that will actually ferment chocolate into heart-healthy, anti-inflammatory compounds. At the 247th National Meeting Exposition of the American Chemical Society, hosted at the Dallas Convention Center this last March, this conclusion was drawn and presented. Maria Moore who is surprisingly enough, an undergraduate student working on this research stated that two different types of microbes live within a person’s stomach. There are good ones like â€Å"Bifidobacterium and lactic acid bacteria†, which help to break down the chocolate, and then there’s the not so great ones such as some forms of Clostridia and E. coli, which have been known to not only produce inflammation, but also to potentially cause â€Å"gas, bloating, diarrhea and constipation†. She notes that, â€Å"When you eat dark chocolate, they [the good microbes] grow and ferment it, producing compou nds that are anti-inflammatory†. These researchers from Louisiana State University, led by John Finley, Ph.D., are the first to be conducting a study about dark chocolate’s effects on the multiple bacteria that reside within the stomach. It was said that when the compounds are absorbed, they effectively reduce the possibility of a stroke in later years by lessening cardiovascular tissue inflammation. By testing a total of 3 different types of cocoa powder in a mock digestive tract composed of â€Å"modified test tubes† used to mimic normal digestion, these researchers, â€Å"subjected the non-digestible materials to anaerobic fermentation using human fecal bacteria†. The main ingredient in chocolate, the thing that makes chocolate, chocolate cocoa powder, contains an abundance of polyphenolic compounds (antioxidants) catechin and epicatechin being two prominent examples and dietary fiber in a relatively small amount, both of which are â€Å"poorly dig ested and absorbed†. Finley then explained that, â€Å"In our study we found that the fiber is fermented and the large polyphenolic polymers are metabolized to smaller molecules, which are more easily absorbed. These smaller polymers exhibit anti-inflammatory activity†. Also, polyphenols found in the stomach may be converted or transformed to reduce inflammation by joining together prebiotics and cocoa powder fiber, increasing one’s overall health. Prebiotics can be defined as complex carbohydrates that cannot be broken down and digested, but the good bacteria in the stomach like to â€Å"eat† them. Finley then went on to say that, â€Å"When you ingest prebiotics, the beneficial gut microbial population increases and outcompetes any undesirable microbes in the gut, like those that cause stomach problems†. This article ended with a note on how dark chocolate could prove to be even more beneficial if combined with things like pomegranate, acai berry or other solid fruits (American Chemical Society, 2014). As far as how this concept pertains to the things that we have talked about in class this past year, we may need to dive a little deeper into the process than this article goes. Because we have yet to really learn anything about physio-chemistry which is where a vast majority of these concepts apply we’re going to have to talk in rather general terms. Considering the fact that the class is termed, â€Å"General Chemistry†, it would seem reasonable to do just that. First things first, we must consider a lab that was done rather early on in the year. While discussing solubility in class, a lab was done in which a certain solution was suspended in a test tube, combined with another solution and then heated until a solid was produced. This process formed something called a ‘precipitate’. Precipitate is define in the dictionary as, â€Å"to cause (something solid) to become separated from a liquid especially by a chemical process† (referring to the proc edure) or merely as a â€Å"a substance precipitated from a solution† (the solid itself) (Merriam-Websters online dictionary, n.d.). The other concept worth taking note of is thermodynamics. We have discussed Gibbs Free Energy in class these past few weeks. This too plays a role. A. D. McNaught and A. Wilkinson, the compilers of Compendium of Chemical Terminology, 2nd ed. (the Gold Book), refer to a process called Ostwald Ripening a process in which small, solid particles in a liquid compound are taken out of solution, while the dissolved species residing on the outside of those larger particles undergo redeposition. This process is one of the key underlying contributors to digestion. Food enters the stomach which is suspended (allowing the effects of gravity) placed in a solution of hydrochloric acid, potassium chloride, and sodium chloride (gastric acid) (Stewart, 1981), heated by the body, and then, through Ostwald Ripening, the food comes out as a larger, â€Å"purer/cleaner† (American Chemical Society, 2014), precipitated substance . One of the reasons why this process goes over so smoothly is because, â€Å"smaller particles have a higher surface energy, hence higher total Gibbs energy, than larger particles, giving rise to an apparent higher solubility† (McNaught Wilkinson, 1997). These concepts are important to take note of, with respect to the article about how great dark-chocolate is for a person’s overall health, because in order to understand how the chocolate is broken down and absorbed, there needs to be a foundation for how the process works in general. Understanding that the substance will dissociate in the stomach and the essentials for that operation, will open up a better foundation for someone to apprehend what the article was stating. The researchers concluded that chocolate contains two poorly digested materials. After the brief discussion on what digestion is, it can determined that chocolate has certain substances that cannot be precipitated. What then does the body do with what it cannot digest, or break down? Well, the answer according to the article is that they are â€Å"eaten†, fermented, metabolized and then absorbed by bacteria. In the case of cocoa powder, the products of this process have anti-inflammatory properties and can reduce the risk of stroke and stomach problems (American Chemical Society, 2014). Even though all the information on digestion was not included in this article, I thought what they did include was sufficiently put together, but in my personal opinion, to anyone who isn’t already knowledgeable about the subject in at least some capacity, would walk away from the article thinking nothing more than, â€Å"Sweet, dark-chocolate is good for me. I should eat more of it.† While this article is not necessarily promoting such action, it’s not opposing it either. The information, however, seems to be geared towards those who do, in fact, have an already established foundation for this type of material. I thought that the article was very reader-friendly and tried to give anyone curious enough to read about it a basic overview of the study, but I was ultimately left questioning more than I was before reading it. Because of what I have learned about thermodynamics, solubility and precipitation, I have to wonder a couple of things. For instance, how do good bacteria â€Å"eat† away the complex carbohydrates and dietary fiber and then ferment it? Is the process drastically different than digestion? What sort of heat is needed for that reaction to occur? I am interested in how, at the end of each process both digestion and fermentation/metabolization nutrients from the substance eaten are absorbed. How is the process of events different for each reaction? I have to wonder how these compounds have anti-inflammatory properties after absorption. What do those bacterium do to the dark-chocolate’s components, and ultimately, why isn’t the bacteria digested or fermented? Does it have to do with what reactions occur within the stomach? That would my best guess. These are all questions that I ask myself now because general chemistry has taught me a lot about reactions, what will react, what won’t and in what capacity. Because of that, I am left wondering more about what it is exactly that is happening in my stomach, not only when I eat dark-chocolate, but any time I put food in my mouth. How does our body know how to process certain foods? This concept is very interesting, and I have general chemistry to thank for that. Works Cited American Chemical Society. Press Room. (2014, March 18). The precise reason for the health benefits of dark chocolate: mystery solved. Retrieved May 29, 2014, from http://www.acs.org/content/acs/en/pressroom/newsreleases/2014/march/the-precise-reason-for-the-health-benefits-of-dark-chocolate-mystery-solved.html McNaught, A. D., Wilkinson, A. (1997). Ostwald ripening. Compendium of Chemical Terminology (the Gold Book). Oxford: Blackwell Scientific Publications. precipitate. n.d., In Merriam-Webster.com. Retrieved May 29, 2014, from http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/precipitate Stewart, P. A. (1981). Chapter 1: 1.5 Other Bodily Fluids. How to understand acid-base: a quantitative acid-base primer for biology and medicine. New York: Elsevier.

Essay --

Question 1: Answer each of the following questions in MSWord a) Why is email an important toll in modern communications? Emails are important because it’s very fast, no need wait for answers, it’s in no time. It is good choice because it’s online. You can send text messages, attached file, even you can communicate face to face that’s using microphone and web camera. You can use emails in every place that have WiFi. b) What components make up an email message? Email components are recipient address, CC (carbon Copy), subject, editing tools, text editor, and attachment. CC means if you put another people email address in this line they will get email copy as well. Attachment – you can add and send files like pictures, sound files, signatures etc. c) What email account should people consider using? There are a lot of email providers. I will show 10 most popular. †¢ Google GMAIL †¢ Microsoft Hotmail †¢ Yahoo †¢ Outlook †¢ GMX †¢ Mail.com †¢ AOL †¢ Inbox.com †¢ Zoho †¢ Lycos mail These emails providers are free and provide much more than just send and receive messages. d) What is good email etiquet...

Augustus :: essays research papers

A copy below of the deeds of the divine Augustus, by which he subjected the whole wide earth to the rule of the Roman people, and of the money which he spent for the state and Roman people, inscribed on two bronze pillars, which are set up in Rome. 1. In my nineteenth year, on my own initiative and at my own expense, I raised an army with which I set free the state, which was oppressed by the domination of a faction. For that reason, the senate enrolled me in its order by laudatory resolutions, when Gaius Pansa and Aulus Hirtius were consuls (43 B.C.E.), assigning me the place of a consul in the giving of opinions, and gave me the imperium. With me as propraetor, it ordered me, together with the consuls, to take care lest any detriment befall the state. But the people made me consul in the same year, when the consuls each perished in battle, and they made me a triumvir for the settling of the state. 2. I drove the men who slaughtered my father into exile with a legal order, punishing their crime, and afterwards, when they waged war on the state, I conquered them in two battles. 3. I often waged war, civil and foreign, on the earth and sea, in the whole wide world, and as victor I spared all the citizens who sought pardon. As for foreign nations, those which I was able to safely forgive, I preferred to preserve than to destroy. About five hundred thousand Roman citizens were sworn to me. I led something more than three hundred thousand of them into colonies and I returned them to their cities, after their stipend had been earned, and I assigned all of them fields or gave them money for their military service. I captured six hundred ships in addition to those smaller than triremes. 4. Twice I triumphed with an ovation, and three times I enjoyeda curule triumph and twenty one times I was named emperor. When the senate decreed more triumphs for me, I sat out from all of them. I placed the laurel from the fasces in the Capitol, when the vows which I pronounced in each war had been fulfilled.

Hamlet has been read by various critics as dramatically Essay

Revenge tragedy was a popular theme when Shakespeare began his play writing career. The central feature of each revenge play was a hero who sought to avenge a wrong in a society where the law was unreliable. â€Å"Hamlet† is usually described as a revenge tragedy. The revenge in Renaissance drama emerged as a dominant genre. By modifying material sources Shakespeare was able to take an unremarkable revenge story and make it into one with fundamental themes and problems of the Renaissance. The Renaissance is a vast cultural phenomenon that began in 15th century Italy with the recovery of the classical Greek and Latin texts that had been lost in the middle-ages. â€Å"Hamlet†, by Shakespeare, uses the traditional conventions which an Elizabethan audience would have expressed interest in because of their moral and social implications. Kyd’s best known play † The Spanish Tragedy† was the most influential tragedy of the Elizabethan period inspired by the tragedies of Seneca, both of which served up a rich diet of madness, melancholy and revenge. However â€Å"Hamlet† has outlived most revenge plays and is still immensely popular. Vengeance was forbidden in the Elizabethan era as it was thought unethical and sinful because it could consume a person, erasing within them any sense of moral justice. This thought preoccupies Hamlet for much of the play. An Elizabethan audience would have sympathised with Hamlet’s attitude towards revenge and the tension of having fundamental Christian beliefs about mercy contrasted with the human impulse for revenge. To kill a king or queen who was protected by the divine aura of kingship was seen as an act of treason. However vengeance was also seen as an honour which had to be satisfied. Although an Elizabethan audience would have had prevailing Christian beliefs about mercy juxtaposed with secular view points in tune with human impulse for revenge, a modern audience would empathise with â€Å"Hamlet† as a revenge hero due to the 20th century concept of the â€Å"just war† theory, which states that war can only take place under certain conditions e.g. when all forms of peaceful negotiations have failed. In â€Å"Hamlet† soliloquies are used to reveal Hamlet’s innermost thoughts reflecting his contemplative character, a convention that an Elizabethan audience would have understood. Hamlet’s melancholy is a leading factor throughout the play; his soliloquies give us a more in-depth perception as to what he is thinking. We can not read minds and in theatre, it is important for us to have this insight into the characters mind as away of understanding motivations. In Hamlet’s case, we are aware of this from the beginning. Hamlet is extremely distraught by the death of his father and the incestuous union of his mother and Claudius: â€Å"How weary, stale, flat and unprofitable Seems to me all the uses of the world! Fie on’t, ah fie, ’tis an unweeded garden† This statement is dramatic in that he is using the unweeded garden as a way of metaphorically speaking about our world that is full of ailment and repulsiveness as opposed to a weeded garden which would represent order and contentment. Although an Elizabethan audience would have accepted Hamlets hesitation, a modern audience would accept and understand the feelings expressed in Hamlet’s soliloquies. Hamlets passionate first soliloquy provides a striking contrast to the controlled dialogue he must exchange with Claudius and his court. The primary function of the soliloquy is to reveal to the audience Hamlet’s melancholy and despair at the time he is presenting the soliloquy. A modern audience would realise that Hamlet is â€Å"a mere Prince of Philosophical Speculators who would not feel at home in an incestuous tomb of politics†ithus delaying this actions to avenge his father’s death. William Hazlitt also states that Hamlet â€Å"is not a character marked by strength of will or even passion, but by refinement of thought and sentiment†i. This marks him out as â€Å"a misfit in a treacherous world†. The world in which Hamlet is living in is claustrophobic full of deception, spying and greed. Brannagh’s interpretation of â€Å"Hamlet† presents this idea effectively through the use of mirrors in the Great Hall, behind which people spy on one another. Hamlet himself notices that Elsinore is a prison rather than a sanction: â€Å"Denmark’s a prison world†¦ in which there are many confines Wards and dungeons†¦ † In a disjointed outpouring of disgust, anger, sorrow and grief, Hamlet explains that, without expectation, everything in the world is either futile or contemptible. His speech is saturated with suggestions of rot and corruption, as seen in the basic usage of words such as â€Å"rank† and â€Å"gross†, and the metaphor associating the world with â€Å"an unweeded garden†. The nature of the his grief is soon exposed, as we learn that his mother, Gertrude, has married her brother-in-law only two months after the death of Hamlet’s father, believing that her display of love was a pretense to satisfy her own lust and greed. Shakespeare employs the use of juxtaposition and contrast to enhance Hamlet’s feelings of contempt, disgust and inadequacy. Another juxtaposition in the soliloquy is Hamlet’s use of Hyperion and a satyr to denote his father and uncle, respectively. Hyperion, the Titan God of light, represents honor and virtue, all traits belonging to Hamlet’s father. Satyrs, the half-human and half-beast companions of the Wine-God Dionysus, represents lasciviousness and overindulgence, much like Hamlet’s uncle. It is therefore no wonder Hamlet develops disgust for Claudius. An important contrast in this soliloquy is seen in Hamlet’s self-depreciating comment; â€Å"But no more like my father Than I to Hercules† Hamlet’s comparison of himself to the courageous Greek hero indicates his developing lack of self worth, a theme focused upon in the second soliloquy. In addition to revealing Hamlet’s plot to catch the king in his guilt, Hamlet’s second soliloquy uncovers the essence of Hamlet’s true conflict. Hamlet is committed to seeking revenge for his father, yet he cannot act due to his revulsion towards extracting the cold and calculating revenge. Determined to convince himself to carry out the premeditated murder of his uncle, Hamlet works himself into a frenzy. He hopes that his passions will halt his better judgment and he will then be able to kill Claudius without hesitation. But Hamlet fails to quell his apprehensions and can not act immediately. The traditional revenge hero would be seen, by an Elizabethan audience, as one who sought to avenge a wrong in an unjust society. Hamlet reflects the Elizabethan views of revenge with his determined heart during the second soliloquy. The soliloquy leaves the reader feeling that Hamlet will keep his word and that revenge will certainly follow in the flowing act. However, Hamlet’s determination begins to deteriorate as the play progresses suggesting Hamlet’s ambivalence of avenging his father’s death, through phrases such as â€Å"o cursed spite that even I was born to set things right†. From this point onwards Hamlet fails to carry out the avenger’s role, which would have defied an Elizabethan audience’s tradition. Shakespeare intentionally defies the traditional conventions because he wants to show that Hamlet is different. However, Hamlet gains sympathy from the modern audience rather than loses sympathy because a modern audience might be more interested to consider how many uncertainties our lives are built upon and Hamlet’s psychological motivation. Unlike Hamlet’s first two major soliloquies, the third and most famous speech seems to be governed by reason and not frenzied emotion. Unable to do little but wait for completion of his plan to â€Å"catch the conscience of the king†, Hamlet sparks an internal philosophical debate on the advantages and disadvantages of existence, and whether it is one’s right to end his or her own life. Hamlet must find the appropriate analysis in his situation, however finds himself shifting back and forth between consideration of whether action or inaction is better. In terms of Hamlet’s analysis, the two issues are closely related. Yet, his words in Act 2 Scene 2 highlight his understanding that man’s nobility transcends the notion of revenge: â€Å"What a piece of work is man! How noble In reason, how infinite in faculties, in form and moving how express And admirable, in action†¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦ † He has a public obligation to do right by Denmark, but this should not be done morally unless it is done in good will. It can therefore be said that Hamlet’s deepening grief is blinding his sound judgment and fogging his path for acceptance of his misgiving. As a result Hamlet begins berating himself with words such as â€Å"ass† and â€Å"scullion†, for failing to carry out his duty as an avenger, even though he has real reasons for revenge. Hamlet is hypersensitive. Everything that has happened to him has made him intensely self-aware and ready to be self-critical. Although an Elizabethan audience would not have accepted Hamlet’s hesitation, a modern audience would accept and understand the feelings expressed in Hamlet’s soliloquies because hesitation is natural in humanity. The soliloquy ends with Hamlet planning to â€Å"Catch the conscience of the king† through a play. Thrilled that his scheme will help prove that Claudius killed his father, Hamlet experiences a sudden surge of confidence. The word â€Å"conscience† has more significance than it may seem. It can be read as a conflation of Hellenistic and Roman with Christian influences extending the apostle Paul into Shakespeare’s time. Going well beyond a guilty feeling, it points forwards and backwards providing guidance to action. Hamlet’s last soliloquy is crucial to our understanding of his character development. By the end of the soliloquy, Hamlet brings to a halt his solemn contemplation on the immoral act of murderous revenge, and finally accepts it as a necessary duty. It is not that Hamlet has presented a solid and reasonable argument to convince himself of his terrible responsibility: rather he has driven himself to the conclusion with intense and distorted thoughts. Hamlet accuses himself of forgetting his father in the â€Å"bestial oblivion†, yet he thinks his problem could be â€Å"thinking to precisely on the event†. More ever, although Hamlet has seen Fortinbras only a moment earlier in the play, and knows nothing of his true motives for going to war, Hamlet convinces himself that he is fighting to protect his honor. Part of Hamlet realizes the idea of such a conviction, however illogical and futile, he focuses on the image of Fortinbras courageously leading his troops. Hamlet’s reason, the part of him that has been dominant throughout the play; the part of him that questions the â€Å"honour† in murder and revenge, this time cannot provide a rebuttal. Hamlet is overcome by his obligations to enact revenge. Hamlet was once greatly distressed over having to exact payment for this father’s murder, even though the reason for such revenge was weighty. Now, Hamlet commends the idea of the â€Å"imminent death of twenty thousand men†. Laertes, Fortinbras and Hamlet are all sons seeking to avenge a wrong in an unjust society. Laertes displays an impulsive reaction when angered. Laertes’ imprudent actions are motivated by fury and frustration, giving little thought to action â€Å"I’ll be revenged most thoroughly for my father† This provides an insight into Laertes’ mind displaying his desire for revenge at any cost. In contrast, Hamlet looks for certainty, through contemplation, before taking action, seeking a right without tainting his mind. Likewise, Fortinbras is an obvious contrast to Hamlet, though his situation similar, as a man of action. Hamlet himself notices the contrast: â€Å"†¦ tender prince, whose spirit with divine ambition puffed Makes mouths at the invisible event†¦ † Laertes is fast to act. He wants to revenge and he wants it immediately. His actions are rushed, allowing the possibility of manipulation by Claudius. He cannot let his natural feelings rule his will. He only thinks about his consequences after he has performed. This is evident at the end of the play when he asks for Hamlet’s forgiveness when he says â€Å"I am justly killed with mine own treachery†. He is too willing to believe the king’s version of events, thus Claudius uses Laertes anger for his own benefit. Laertes only wants revenge and is not concerned with punishment. Shakespeare makes these contrasts to highlight Hamlet as a stereotypical â€Å"weak avenger†, but an infinitely more interesting and complex character consumed by the moral complications of revenge, which reveal him as a hero blesses or cursed by the power of individual thought as opposed to a hero who follows unthinkingly the revenge tradition. An Elizabethan audience would see â€Å"Hamlet† as a weak avenger with a â€Å"fatal flaw† and a propensity to think too much, therefore not keeping within the dramatic conventions, which would have been greatly appreciated by an Elizabethan audience. However, a modern audience may sympathise greatly with Hamlet’s inability to abandon or fulfill his role because making an epic decision is rarely straightforward. It seems that Shakespeare wants to present Hamlet as a tortured soul, influenced by Christian beliefs. The dilemma â€Å"Hamlet† faces is in some ways the dilemma faced by civilized man at large, William Hazlitt supports this view by stating that â€Å"Hamlet is one of those plays that we think the most about because it reflects on human life†i. Bibliography – Hamlet: Cambridge School – Shakespeare & criticism : F. E. Haliday – Characters in Shakespeare’s play- Hamlet: William Hazlitt